附属第三医院放射科,广东,广州,510515
网络首发:2018-07-19,
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
彭令荣, 刘卫敏, 江婷, 等. 透明细胞肾癌的表观扩散系数值与组织学分化程度的相关性分析[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2018,39(4).
PENG Ling-rong, LIU Wei-min, JIANG Ting, et al. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value and Histopathological Differentiation of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma[J]. Journal of Sun Yat-sen University (Medical Sciences), 2018, 39(4).
彭令荣, 刘卫敏, 江婷, 等. 透明细胞肾癌的表观扩散系数值与组织学分化程度的相关性分析[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2018,39(4). DOI:
PENG Ling-rong, LIU Wei-min, JIANG Ting, et al. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value and Histopathological Differentiation of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma[J]. Journal of Sun Yat-sen University (Medical Sciences), 2018, 39(4). DOI:
:【目的】分析透明细胞肾癌(CCRCC)的表观扩散系数(ADC)值与组织学分化程度的关系。【方法】 回顾性收集经病理证实的CCRCC患者63例,并根据Fuhrman病理分级Ⅰ~Ⅳ级标准,分为高分化组(Ⅰ级和Ⅱ 级)、中分化组(Ⅲ级)、低分化组(Ⅳ级),所有患者均行中腹部MR 平扫、增强和DWI 成像检查(1.5T,b = 800 s/ mm2),分别测得CCRCC 的ADC 值,采用单因素方差比较不同CCRCC 组织学分化程度与ADC 值的差异,采用 Spearman等级相关检验分析CCRCC的组织学分化程度与ADC值的相关性;并采用受试者工作特征ROC曲线评 价CCRCC 的ADC 值诊断高分化CCRCC、低分化CCRCC 的效能。【结果】高、中、低分化组CCRCC 的ADC 值 (10-3 mm2/s)分别为1.80 ± 0.11、1.56 ± 0.07、1.42 ± 0.06,它们之间均有统计学差异(均P = 0.000),CCRCC的ADC 值与组织学分化程度呈显著的正相关(r = 0.905,P = 0.000);受试者工作特征ROC曲线分析显示ADC值诊断高 分化CCRCC的最佳临界点值为1.61 × 10-3 mm2/s,相应的敏感度与特异度分别89.5%、99.0%;诊断低分化CCRCC 的最佳临界点值为1.54 × 10-3 mm2/s,相应的敏感度与特异度分别为86.7%和98.8%。【结论】ADC 值在预测 CCRCC的组织学分化程度方面较高的价值。
Abstract: 【Objective】To evaluate the relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC)and histopatho? logical differentiation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma(CCRCC).【Methods】In this retrospective analysis,we investigat? ed 63 patients with CCRCC confirmed by pathology. 63 patients who had were grouped according to the Fuhrman patholog? ical grading system,fromⅠtoⅣ. Four grades were merged into three classifications consisting of well-differentiated CCRCC(ⅠandⅡ),moderatedly-differentiated CCRCC(Ⅲ)and poorly-differentiated CCRCC(Ⅳ). Magnetic reso? nance examinations of magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) plain scan,LALA dynamic enhanced scan and diffusion weighted imaging(DWI)(1.5T,b value:800 s/mm2)were performed. The each ADC value was measured. ANOVA was used to compare ADC values between the three different histopathological groups. Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between histopathological differentiation of CCRCC and ADC values. A receiver operating curve (ROC)analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of ADC values.【Results】The ADC value(10-3 mm2/s) of well-differentiated,moderately differentiated and poorly-differentiated CCRCC was 1.80 ± 0.11,1.56 ± 0.07,1.42 ± 0.06,respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed among them(P = 0.000). There was a high signifi? cantly positive correlation between ADC value and histopathological differentiation of CCRCC(r = 0.905,P = 0.000). The ROC curve showed the optimal cutoff point of ADC value was 1.61 × 10- 3 mm2/s in diagnosing well-differentiated CCRCC. Taking 1.61 × 10-3 mm2/s as the threshold value,sensitivity and specificity of differential diagnosis was 89.5% and 99%,respectively. The ROC curve showed the optimal cutoff point of ADC value was 1.54 × 10-3 mm2/s in diagnosing poorly-differentiated CCRCC. Taking 1.54 × 10-3 mm2/s as the threshold value,sensitivity and specificity of differential di? agnosis was 86.7% and 98.8%,respectively.【Conclusion】ADC value is important for predicting histopathological differ? entiation of CCRCC .
0
浏览量
486
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621
