Value of P Wave Duration in Prediction of Recurrence after Ablation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Patients
中山大学学报(医学科学版)2016年37卷第2期
作者机构:
作者简介:
基金信息:
中山大学“5010计划”(2007011);广东省科技计划社会发展(2012B031800296)
DOI:
中图分类号:
网络首发:2016-03-20,
纸质出版:2016
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
胡晓亮. P 波时限预测阵发性心房颤动射频消融术后复发的价值[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2016,37(2).
Value of P Wave Duration in Prediction of Recurrence after Ablation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Patients[J]. Journal of Sun Yat-sen University (Medical Sciences), 2016, 37(2).
胡晓亮. P 波时限预测阵发性心房颤动射频消融术后复发的价值[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2016,37(2).DOI:
Value of P Wave Duration in Prediction of Recurrence after Ablation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Patients[J]. Journal of Sun Yat-sen University (Medical Sciences), 2016, 37(2).DOI:
95% CI 0.840-0.972)均为房颤复发的独立危险因素?以Ⅱ导联P波时限变化值预测房颤复发优于Ⅲ导联(P = 0.01)?以Ⅱ导联P波时限变化-2.21 ms为阈值可获得最佳诊断效能
此时敏感性和特异性为85.29%和83.94%?以Ⅱ导联P波时限变化0 ms为阈值
敏感性和特异性为65.62%和91.37%
【结论】 Ⅱ导联P波时限变化值可更好的预测房颤术后复发?
Abstract
Abstract: 【Objective】 To explore P wave duration to predict the recurrence postablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients.【Methods】 Totally 171 paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients undergoing circumferential pulmonary vein isolation were included in this study. The electrocardiogram before and after ablation were recorded. The P wave duration in lead Ⅱ
Ⅲ
aVF and V1 were measured
the change value of P wave duration were calculated. 【Results】 P wave duration was significantly shortened in lead Ⅱ
Ⅲ and V1 after ablation (P < 0.001). All patients were divided into recurrence group (n = 32) and non-recurrence group (n=139). Compared with non-recurrence group
the change value of P wave duration in lead Ⅱ
Ⅲ and V1 were smaller (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in P wave duration before or after ablation and other indications between two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that the smaller change value of P wave duration in lead Ⅱ(P < 0.001
OR = 0.73
95% CI 0.648-0.824) and Ⅲ (P = 0.006
OR = 0.904
95% CI 0.840-0.972) were independent predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence. The change value of P wave duration in lead Ⅱ is superior to lead Ⅲ in predicting atrial fibrillation recurrence after ablation (P = 0.01). Using -2.21ms as the best cutoff
change value in lead Ⅱ had a 85.29% sensitivity and a 83.94% specificity. Using 0ms as the cutoff
the change value in lead Ⅱ had a 65.62% sensitivity and a 91.37% specificity. 【Conclusion】 Change value of P wave duration in lead Ⅱ can better predict atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency ablation.