网络首发:2016-07-20,
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
全段食管癌旋转容积调强与固定野静态调强和三维适形放疗计划的剂量学比较[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2016,37(4).
Dosimetric Comparison of VMAT, IMRT, and 3DCRT for Treatment of Esophagus Cancer[J]. Journal of Sun Yat-sen University (Medical Sciences), 2016, 37(4).
摘 要: 【目的】 通过比较旋转容积调强(VMAT)?静态调强(Step & shoot IMRT)和三维适形放射治疗(3DCRT)技术在全段食管癌的剂量学差异
探讨适于全段食管癌的放射治疗方法?【方法】 选取10例晚期全段食管癌患者
分别制定3野(前野+两后斜野或者两前斜野+后野)3DCRT
5野和7野静态IMRT
360°单弧VAMT 和部分弧VMAT五种放疗计划?比较不同计划靶区剂量分布?适形度指数(CI)?均匀性指数(HI)以及危及器官受量
筛选出合适的治疗方案?同时记录加速器的总机器跳数(MU)和治疗时间
以评估不同技术的执行效率?【结果】 靶区剂量对比显示IMRT和VMAT技术在靶区覆盖率?适形度和剂量分布均匀性方面均优于3DCRT
VMAT主要剂量学指标略优于IMRT?VMAT和IMRT显著降低了脊髓?心脏和双肺V5?V10剂量?与3DCRT和IMRT治疗相比
VMAT治疗时间最短
所需MU最少?【结论】 对全段食管癌治疗
VMAT与静态IMRT较传统3DCRT有明显的剂量学优势
尤其是VMAT技术
在满足临床剂量学要求的同时
可以显著缩短治疗时间
有利于减轻治疗中不确定因素的影响及患者的不适?
Abstract: 【Objective】 To explore the suitable way for esophagus cancer radiotherapy by dosimetric comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT)
intensity modulation radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulation arc therapy (VMAT). 【Methods】 Ten patients with multiple primary cancers of the esophagus were enrolled. 3DCRT
5-field IMRT
7-field IMRT
single arc VMAT and partial-arc VMAT plans were generated for each patient. Conformity index (CI)
heterogeneity index (HI)
dose to organs at risk (OAR)
deliverytime and monitor units (MU) were all recorded as dosimetric indices for plan comparison.【Results】 IMRT and VMAT plans were superior to 3D-CRT concerning target coverage
conformity and dose heterogeneity. Both IMRT and VMAT can significantly reduce the maximum radiation dose to the spinal cord and heart
and decrease the low-dose radiation volume V5 and V10 for lung. Compared to IMRT
VMAT requires the shortest delivery time and smallest MU.【Conclusion】 VMAT can save treatment delivery time while improving the dose distribution for both target and critical structures. It was thus recommended for esophagus cancer radiotherapy.
0
浏览量
350
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621
