网络首发:2015-07-20,
纸质出版:2015
移动端阅览
适形调强放射治疗时代同期化疗对中危鼻咽癌的 治疗价值探讨[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2015,36(4).
Investigation of Value of Concurrent Chemotherapy for Intermediate Risk Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Era[J]. Journal of Sun Yat-sen University (Medical Sciences), 2015, 36(4).
摘 要: 【目的】 探讨在适形调强放射治疗(IMRT)时代同期化疗对中危鼻咽癌(II期及T3N0M0期)的治疗价值?【方法】将2009年10月至2012年12月中山大学附属肿瘤防治中心共440例单纯IMRT治疗或IMRT治疗及同期化疗的中危鼻咽癌患者纳入研究?使用倾向性评分匹配的方法
得到宿主以及肿瘤因素均衡匹配的单纯放疗组和同期放化疗组? 【结果】 全组患者中位随访时间为37.3个月?在匹配前
接受单纯IMRT治疗的患者对比接受IMRT治疗及同期化疗的患者
估计三年无瘤生存(FFS)?局部区域无复发生存(LR-FFS)?无远处转移生存(D-FFS)?总生存(OS)差异无统计学意义?在多因素分析中
同期化疗并非3年FFS?LR-FFS?D-FFS?OS的独立预后因素?然而
在接受IMRT治疗及同期化疗的患者发生严重急性毒性较接受单纯IMRT治疗的患者显著增多;在匹配后
单纯放疗组和同期放化疗组在各项生存终点均无显著差异(FFS: 92.8% vs 91.2%
P = 0.801; LR-FFS: 95.2% vs 94.4%
P = 0.755; D-FFS: 96.4% vs 96.3%
P = 0.803; OS: 98.2% vs 98.9%
P =0.276)?【结论】 对于IMRT治疗下的中危鼻咽癌患者
同期化疗并不能带来生存获益
却显著增加了急性严重毒性的发生
同期化疗是否应作为中危鼻咽癌患者的常规治疗值得进一步的探讨?
Abstract: 【Objective】 To valuate the efficacy of additional concurrent chemotherapy for patients with intermediate risk (stage II and T3N0M0) nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era. 【Methods】 440 patients with intermediate risk NPC treated with IMRT alone or IMRT plus concurrent chemotherapy between October 2009 and December 2012 in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were studied retrospectively. Propensity score matching was carried out to create radiotherapy group (RT group) and chemoradiotherapy group (CRT group) equally matched for host and tumor factors. 【Results】 We observed no significant difference in estimated three year failure free survival (FFS)
locoregional failure-free survival (LR-FFS)
distant failure-free survival (D-FFS)
and overall survival (OS) between two groups. Multivariate analyses failed to demonstrate concurrent chemotherapy as an independent prognostic factor for FFS
LR-FFS
and D-FFS. However
significantly more severe acute toxicities were observed in the CRT group than in the RT group. There were no significant difference inall survival endpoints between the matched RT cohort and the CRT cohort (FFS: 92.8% versus 91.2%
P = 0.801; LR-FFS: 95.2% versus 94.4%
P = 0.755; D-FFS: 96.4% versus 96.3%
P = 0.803; OS: 98.2% versus 98.9%
P =0.276). 【Results】 Our results demonstrated that for patients with intermediate risk NPC treated with IMRT
additional concurrent chemotherapy did not provide any significant survival benefit but significantly more severe acute toxicities
therefore whether concurrent chemotherapy should be recommended as routine use worth further investigation.
0
浏览量
243
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621
