网络首发:2015-07-20,
纸质出版:2015
移动端阅览
实时三维超声造影在判断移植肾动脉数目及监测动脉 并发症中的应用[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2015,36(4).
Value of Real-time Three-dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Detecting the Amount of Renal Artery and Arterial Vascular Complication of Renal Allograft[J]. Journal of Sun Yat-sen University (Medical Sciences), 2015, 36(4).
实时三维超声造影在判断移植肾动脉数目及监测动脉 并发症中的应用[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2015,36(4). DOI:
Value of Real-time Three-dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Detecting the Amount of Renal Artery and Arterial Vascular Complication of Renal Allograft[J]. Journal of Sun Yat-sen University (Medical Sciences), 2015, 36(4). DOI:
摘 要: 【目的】 探讨实时三维超声造影(3D-CEUS)在评估移植肾肾动脉(RA)数目及动脉性血管并发症(VC)中的应用?【方法】 回顾性分析30例移植肾患者的二维超声造影(2D-CEUS)及实时3D-CEUS图像?以CT血管成像(CTA)?数字减影血管成像(DSA)或手术记录作为诊断参考标准
分别比较2D-CEUS(方法1)及2D-CEUS联合实时3D-CEUS(方法2)在肾动脉(RA)数目及动脉性VC的诊断水平及诊断信心?采用χ2检验对比两种方法诊断RA数目的诊断符合率进行;采用McNemar 检验及χ2检验比较两种方法的敏感性(Sen)?特异性(Spe)?准确性(ACC);采用秩和检验比较二者的诊断信心?【结果】 1)评价移植肾RA的28例患者中
16例为单支RA
9例为2支RA
>2支RA有3例?两种方法对单支RA评价之间的差异无统计学意义(P = 0.347)
但对≥2支RA的诊断符合率的差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.031)
诊断符合率为41.67%(方法1)及75.00%(方法2)?2)30例患者中
24例不存在VC
确诊移植肾动脉狭窄(TRAS) 2例
动脉血栓2例
肾内动静脉瘘1例
局灶性梗死1例?方法1及方法2诊断移植肾动脉性VC的 Sen?Spe?ACC分别为66.67%?87.50%?83.33%及83.33%?91.67%?90.00%
两种方法在诊断效能上的差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)
但两种方法在诊断信心上的差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.019)?【结论】 2D-CEUS联合实时3D-CEUS能够提高两支及以上移植肾RA显示率
同时对移植肾动脉性VC具有较高的诊断效能
并可提高诊断信心?
Abstract: 【Objective】 To explore the diagnostic value of real-time three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound (3D-CEUS) in assessing the amount of renal artery (RA) and detecting arterial vascular complications (VC) in renal allograft. 【Methods】 Two-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound.(2D-CEUS)...and real-time 3D-CEUS imaging of 30 allograft patients were analyzed retrospectively. Computed tomography angiography (CTA)/digital subtraction angiography(DSA)/surgery record were set as reference standard
and diagnostic capability and confidence grade of 2D-CEUS (Method 1) and 2D-CEUS combined with real-time 3D-CEUS (Method 2) in detecting the amount of RAs and post-operation arterial VC were compared. The χ2 test was used to compare the diagnostic accuracy of RA diagnosis between 2 methods. McNemar and χ2 test was used to evaluate differences in sensitivity (Sen)
specificity (Spe)
accuracy (ACC) in graft arterial VC between 2 methods. Rank sum test was used to assess difference between 2 methods in diagnostic confidence grade. 【Results】 1. Evaluation of amount RA 16 of 28 patients have single RA
two RA in 9
>2RA in3cases. There was a significant difference between 2 methods in displaying two or more RA (P = 0 .031). 2.Diagnostic capability and confidence in arterial VC 24 of 30 cases have no VC
transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) was confirmed in 2 cases
arterial thrombosis in 2 cases
one case with intra-renal arteriovenous fistula
focal infarction in 1 case. Sen
Spe
ACC of diagnosis in arterial VC were 66.67%
87.50%
83.33% (method 1) and 83.33%
91.67%
90.00% (method 2) (P>0.05). There was a significant difference in diagnostic confidence between 2 methods in arterial VC (P = 0.019). 【Conclusion】 Real-time 3D-CEUS combined with 2D-CEUS might improve ≥2RAs displaying and arterial VC detecting
moreover
it would increase confidence in diagnosis.
0
浏览量
312
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621
