网络首发:2014-06-20,
纸质出版:2014
移动端阅览
前降钙素原、C-反应蛋白和临床肺部感染评分对呼吸机 相关肺炎诊断的意义[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2014,35(3).
Role of Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and ClinicalPulmonary Infection Score in Diagnosing Ventilator-associatedPneumonia[J]. Journal of Sun Yat-sen University (Medical Sciences), 2014, 35(3).
摘 要: 【目的】 探讨前降钙素原(PCT)、C-反应蛋白(CRP)和简化临床肺部感染评分(CPIS)对呼吸机相关肺炎(VAP)的诊断效能、相关性以及联合使用的临床诊断价值。【方法】选择广州中山大学附属第一医院重症监护病房(ICU)且疑诊为VAP的成人患者纳入此前瞻性诊断试验,监测入住ICU或气管插管当日以及疑诊VAP当日的PCT、CRP,计算急性生理学和慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)、序贯器官功能障碍评分(SOFA)和简化CPIS评分,以后每日计算简化的CPIS评分,每48h复查PCT、CRP,收集支气管灌洗物,直至试验结束。结束后计算PCT、CRP、简化CPIS诊断VAP的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值,绘制上述指标诊断VAP的受试者工作曲线(ROC)并计算曲线下面积(AUC),根据敏感性、特异性的最佳比值来确定诊断的最佳阈值。【结果】筛选459例患者进入随访流程,最终符合条件者30例,17例通过微生物学证据确诊VAP,13例临床上达到疑诊标准但缺乏微生物学证据而未确诊。PCT、CRP、CPIS诊断VAP的AUC值分别为0.735(95%CI:0.536-0.934),0.599(95%CI:0.361-0.838)及0.809(95%CI:0.641-0.976)。PCT以0.685ng/mL为阈值,诊断敏感性和特异性分别为76.5%和62.5%;CRP以53.65 mg/L为阈值,诊断敏感性和特异性分别为52.9%和62.5%;简化CPIS以6分为阈值,诊断敏感性和特异性分别为60.5%和92%。PCT≥0.685ng/mL联合简化CPIS≥6分诊断VAP,敏感性和特异性分别为70.6和100%。【结论】 单独使用CRP检测对VAP早期诊断无明显价值;单独使用PCT检测对VAP早期诊断具有一定价值;单独使用简化CPIS进行VAP早期诊断准确性较好;CRP、PCT和简化CPIS评分之间均无显著相关性;简化CPIS评分联合PCT检测有助于提高VAP早期诊断特异性,且敏感性并未降低。
Abstract:【Objective】 To investigate the diagnosis accuracy, relevance and clinicaldiagnostic value of combined use of procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactiveprotein (CRP) and simplified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) on ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). 【Method】 All adult patients, whowere admitted into the Department of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of the First AffiliatedHospital, Sun Yat-Sen University and were clinically developedas suspected VAP patients after 48 h of mechanical ventilation, were enrolled inthis prospective diagnostic test. Measurement of PCT and CRP levels, and the calculationof the simplified CPIS, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health EvaluationⅡ(APACHEⅡ)and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were performed at study entryand on the first day of mechanical ventilation. On the day of VAP suspicion, measurementof PCT, CRP and simplified CPIS levels and cultivation of tracheal aspiration werealso performed once every 48-hour till the completion ofthe test. The simplified CPIS was calculated daily. The sensitivity, specificityand positive and negative predictive values of VAP were determined on the basisof respective calculation of diagnosis of PCT, CRP levels and simplified CPIS atthe completion of the test study. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curvewas created and area under curve (AUC) was calculated.The optimal diagnostic cut-off values were determined on the basis of the best sensitivity/specificityratios. 【Result】 459 adult patients mechanically ventilated were included in ourtest,and 30 patients were eligible finally. Of which 17 patients were microbiologicallyconfirmed as VAP, 13 patients became clinically suspected VAP but without microbiologicstandard. AUC values of VAP resulted from PCT, CRP and CPIS were 0.735 (95%CI:0.536-0.934),0.599(95%CI:0.361-0.838) and 0.809 (95%CI:0.641-0.976), respectively. Using 0.685ng/mL as the best cutoff, PCT had a 76.5% sensitivity and a 62.5% specificity; andusing 6 scores as the best cutoff, CPIS had a 60.5% sensitivity and a 92% specificity.Based on the serum level of PCT≥0.685 ng/mL and CPIS≥6 scores to diagnose VAP, thesensitivity was 70.6% while specificity was 100%. 【Conclusion】 Using the serum levelof CRP alone has little significance on early VAP diagnosis; using the serum levelof PCT alone has certain significance on early VAP diagnosis, and using CPIS forearly VAP diagnosis had the best accuracy. There was no outstanding correlationamong CRP, PCT and CPIS. Joint use of CPIS and PCT could greatly enhance the specificityof early diagnosis of VAP without lowering its sensitivity.
0
浏览量
367
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621
