网络首发:2013-03-20,
纸质出版:2013
移动端阅览
方庭枫. 子宫内膜异位症生育指数与rAFS分期在IVF中的预测价值[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2013,34(2).
Predictive Value of Endometriosis Fertility Index and rAFS Classification in IVF Treatment Cycles[J]. Journal of Sun Yat-sen University (Medical Sciences), 2013, 34(2).
【目的】 探讨子宫内膜异位症生育指数(EFI)与rAFS分期对体外受精胚胎移植(IVFET)的累积妊娠结局的预测价值?【方法】 回顾性分析2008年1月至2011年12月109例143个周期行腹腔镜手术治疗后到本生殖中心行IVFET的子宫内膜异位症(EMs)因素不孕患者的病史?手术资料及妊娠结局?按照rAFS的分期标准对EMs患者进分期
按照EFI的评分标准计算EFI
利用ROC曲线与多水平模型分别比较EFI评分和rAFS分期对IVF累积妊娠结局的影响? 【结果】 (1)EFI评分预测IVF累积妊娠结局的ROC曲线下面积为0.644
大于机会参考线下面积(P < 0.05);诊断界值点为6分
特异性为0.62
敏感性为0.61;AFS分期预测IVF累积妊娠结局的ROC曲线下面积为0.415(P > 0.05)
不具有诊断意义?(2)根据ROC曲线诊断界值点为6分
将患者以6分为界
分别比较4分与5分?≤5分与≥6分?6分与≥7分的累积妊娠率的差异?EFI评分为4分(n = 6)?5分(n = 28)的患者
累积妊娠率为40.0%
44.5%
差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);EFI评分为≤5分(n = 71)
≥6分(n = 72)的患者
总累积妊娠率有统计学差异(38.2% vs. 60.6%
P = 0.005);EFI评分6分(n = 36)
≥7分(n = 37)的患者
累积妊娠率为61.8%
59.5%
差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);<3分的患者
有 17个IVF周期
累积妊娠率为25.0%?rAFS分期为Ⅰ期(n = 28)?Ⅱ期(n = 12)?Ⅲ期(n = 39)?IV期(n = 64)的患者
累积妊娠率无统计学差异(P = 0.163)? 【结论】 子宫内膜异位症生育指数(EFI)可以有效的预测 EMs患者腹腔镜术后IVF累积妊娠结局
≥6分的患者累积妊娠率有明显升高
为EMs患者腹腔术后IVF临床诊疗提供了重要的参考依据?未发现rAFS分期对EMs患者IVFET后的妊娠结局有预测价值?
【Objective】 To determine the predictive value of the endometriosis fertility index and rAFS classification for the outcome of cumulative pregnancy in IVF cycles. 【Method】 Totally 109 infertile women with 143 IVF cycles were retrospectively analyzed from January 2008 to December 2011. Before IVF cycle
these women were diagnosed as endometriosis and treated by laparoscopy in our hospital. Medical history
surgery materials
and pregnancy outcome were collected. Staged patients according to the revised American Fertility Society System; calculated EFI score basing on the endometriosis fertility index system; the ROC curve and the multilevel statistical models were used to assess the differences in cumulative pregnancy rates between different EFI scores and rAFS stages. 【Result】 (1) The areas under ROC curve (AUC) of EFI and rAFS were 0.644 (P < 0.05) and 0.415 (P > 0.05)
respectively. The best point for diagnosis by EFI was 6
so we use EFI scores of 6 as the point. The accumulative pregnancy rates of a EFI scores of 4 (n = 26) and 5 (n = 28) were 40.0% and 44.5%
respectively
there were no significant differences (P > 0.05). The total cumulative pregnancy rates among patients with EFI scores of ≥6 were significantly higher than that of EFI score of ≤5 (38.2% vs 60.6%
P = 0.005). The accumulative pregnancy rates among the EFI scores of 6 (n = 36) and ≥7(n = 37) were comparable (61.8% vs 59.5%
P > 0.05). But the EFI scores of <3
have only 17 IVF cycles
the cumulative pregnancy rate was 25.0%. 28
12
39
64 IVF cycles were assigned to stage Ⅰ
Ⅱ
Ⅲ
and Ⅳ according to the revised American Fertility Society System
statistical significance was not achieved in accumulative pregnancy rates among all stages (Ⅰ ~ Ⅳ
P = 0.163). 【Conclusion】 EFI can be used as a good effective tool to predict pregnancy outcome in the patients attempted to IVF after laparoscopic surgery
the cumulative pregnancy rates among EFI scores of ≥6 were obviously increased
which provides an important basis for IVF treatment. The predictive value of rAFS classification for the pregnancy outcome in IVF cycles were not found.
0
浏览量
580
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621
