1. 附属第一医院妇产科,广东,广州,510058
2. 中山医学院,广东,广州,510080
纸质出版日期:2020,
网络出版日期:2020-11-20,
扫 描 看 全 文
梁炎春, 戴郁菁, 蔡婉玲, 等. 不同减胎方式对单绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胎临床结局的影响[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2020,41(6).
Effect on Clinical Outcomes by Different Selective Fetal Reduction in Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Pregnancy[J]. Journal of Sun Yat-sen University (Medical Sciences), 2020,41(6).
【目的】对比双极脐带电凝减胎术(BCC)与射频消融减胎术(RFA)对单绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胎临床结局的影响。【方法】收集 2009-2019 年间中山大学附属第一医院行妊娠早期超声检查诊断为单绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胎孕妇 53 例作为研究对象。所有孕妇孕期均行选择性减胎术,并在我院规律产检及分娩。回顾性分析统计孕妇基本情况、减胎方式的选择、分娩孕周等相关因素对最终的妊娠结局及新生儿结局产生的影响。数据采用SPSS20.0 软件进行统计学分析。【结果】RFA 组和 BCC 组术后发生下腹紧缩感的比例分别为65.0%和 61.5%,差异无统计学意义,且两组患者经对症处理后下腹紧缩感均可缓解。此外,两组手术时间、住院天数均无统计学差异。RFA 组的分娩孕周为 36( 26 ~ 40)周,晚于 BCC 组的 32 ( 29 ~ 37)周,但两者差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。BCC 组在妊娠 37 周前分娩的比例高于 RFA 组(100% vs. 62.5% ,P = 0.024)。新生儿结局中,BCC 组的低出生体质量儿率大于 RFA 组(92.31% vs. 52.5%,P = 0.025),极低出生体质量儿率的差异则无统计学意义(P > 0.05),小于胎龄儿发生率亦无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。BCC 组的新生儿转到儿科或重症监护进行观察的比例大于 RFA 组(84.62% vs. 30%,P = 0.001)。对新生儿结局造成影响的多因素分析发现分娩孕周<270/7 周是低出生体质量儿发生的危险因素(OR = 2.091,95%CI,0.312 ~ 14.162,P = 0.032)。【结论】无论是 RFA 还是 BCC,对孕妇的妊娠结局和新生儿结局的影响不同。临床上应综合多方面因素个体化选择减胎方式。
【Objective】To compare clinical outcomes between bipolar umbilical cord coagulation(BCC)and radiofrequency ablation(RFA)after selective fetal reduction in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy.【Methods】We retrospectively analyzed all cases of monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies who received selective fetal reduction in The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from 2009 to 2019. Patient underwent regular antenatal care during the whole pregnancy and finally delivered in our hospital. The impact of basic conditions of the patients,different methods of reduction,gestational weeks of delivery and other factors on the final pregnancy outcomes and neonatal outcomes were studied. The data were analyzed by SPSS20.0. 【Results】The frequency of tightening feeling of the lower abdomen of RFA group and BCC group after surgery were 65.0% and 61.5%,respectively(P > 0.05). The symptom was relieved after symptomatic treatment. In addition,time of surgery and the hospitalization days were not statistically different between the two groups. The median gestational age at delivery of the RFA group was 36( 26 ~ 40)weeks,which was later than 32(29~37)weeks of the BCC group,without statistical significance(P > 0.05). The proportion of patients who delivered before 37 weeks in the BCC group was higher than that in the RFA group(100% vs. 62.5%,P = 0.024). In the neonatal outcomes,the rate of low birth weight infants in the BCC group was greater than that in the RFA group (92.31% vs. 52.5%,P = 0.025),but the differences in the rate of very low birth weight infants and the rate of small for gestational age infant were not statistically significant(both P values are greater than 0.05). The rate of neonatal transfer pediatrics or intensive care unit in the BCC group was greater than that of the RFA group(84.62% vs. 30%,P = 0.001). In a multivariate analysis of the effects on neonatal outcomes,multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the association between different indicators and the incidence of low birth weight infants. The results showed that gestational weeks < 270/7 weeks was a risk factor for low birth weight infant(OR = 2.091,95% CI,0.312 to 14.162,P = 0.032).【Conclusions】The effects of RFA and BCC on the pregnancy outcome and neonatal outcome are different. We should consider various factors when we choose individualized method of pregnancy reduction.
单绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胎妊娠减胎双极脐带电凝减胎术射频消融减胎术妊娠结局新生儿结局
monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancypregnancy reductionbipolar umbilical cord coagulationradiofrequency ablationpregnancy outcomeneonatal outcome
0
浏览量
78
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构