

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.中山大学附属第一医院放射科,广东广州510080
2.中山大学附属第一医院神经外科,广东 广州510080
XIE Dingxiang; E-mail: xiedx7@mail.sysu.edu.cn
Received:23 September 2025,
Revised:2025-11-09,
Accepted:16 December 2025,
Published:20 January 2026
移动端阅览
林京怡,赵静,胡天宇等.磁共振弹性成像在常见颅内肿瘤质地评估中的应用[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2026,47(01):143-151.
LIN Jingyi,ZHAO Jing,HU Tianyu,et al.Application of Magnetic Resonance Elastography in the Evaluation of Common Intracranial Tumor Stiffness[J].Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences),2026,47(01):143-151.
林京怡,赵静,胡天宇等.磁共振弹性成像在常见颅内肿瘤质地评估中的应用[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2026,47(01):143-151. DOI: 10.11714/jsysu.med.YX20250138.
LIN Jingyi,ZHAO Jing,HU Tianyu,et al.Application of Magnetic Resonance Elastography in the Evaluation of Common Intracranial Tumor Stiffness[J].Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences),2026,47(01):143-151. DOI: 10.11714/jsysu.med.YX20250138.
目的
2
探讨磁共振弹性成像(MRE)在评估常见颅内肿瘤质地方面的临床应用价值。
方法
2
回顾性收集2023年4月至2024年9月于中山大学附属第一医院接受手术治疗的47例脑肿瘤患者,包括胶质瘤10例、前庭神经鞘瘤12例和脑膜瘤25例。所有患者术前均接受多参数MRI和MRE检查。将弹性图与增强3DT1图像配准后,分别于肿瘤硬度最大及最小区域各放置3个ROI测量弹性值,取其均值作为平均弹性值;同时在基底节层面侧脑室后角区域的脑白质和脑灰质内各置一个ROI,获取正常参考值。由一名对MRE结果单盲的神经外科医师根据手术录像按5分法(1分:柔软,5分:坚硬)对肿瘤术中硬度进行分级。采用组内相关系数(ICC)评估观察者一致性,采用方差分析及非参数检验比较组间弹性值差异,运用Spearman相关分析弹性值与临床病理参数的相关性,并通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估弹性值对肿瘤类型的鉴别效能。
结果
2
两名医师在肿瘤最硬区域和最软区域所测弹性值的ICC分别为0.868和0.831(均
P
<0.01)。脑膜瘤的最大弹性值、最小弹性值及平均弹性值分别为:(1.91±0.28)m/s、(1.66±0.25)m/s、(1.78±0.26)m/s,均显著高于胶质瘤,分别为:(1.59±0.23)m/s、(1.42±0.23)m/s、(1.50±0.22)m/s,(
P
<0.05);前庭神经鞘瘤的各弹性值分别为:(1.70±0.30)m/s、(1.51±0.23)m/s、(1.61±0.26)m/s,均低于脑膜瘤而高于胶质瘤,但差异均无统计学意义(均
P
>0.05)。脑白质弹性值(1.63±0.08)m/s高于脑灰质(1.39±0.12)m/s,差异具有统计学意义(
P
<0.05)。整体样本中,最大、最小及平均弹性值均与术中硬度分级呈显著正相关(分别为:
r
s
=0.591,
r
s
=0.541,
r
s
=0.571,均
P
<0.001),与WHO分级呈负相关(分别为:
r
s
=-0.458,
r
s
=-0.458,
r
s
=-0.480,均
P
<0.01),与Ki-67均无相关性(均
P
>0.05)。
结论
2
MRE可用于评估颅内肿瘤质地,并在一定程度区分肿瘤类型,有助于术前制订更个体化的手术方案。
Objective
2
To explore the clinical potential of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for assessing the stiffness of common intracranial tumors.
Methods
2
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 47 patients with brain tumors who underwent surgical treatment at The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between April 2023 and September 2024. The cohort included 10 cases of glioma, 12 cases of vestibular schwannoma, and 25 cases of meningioma. All patients underwent multiparameter MRI and MRE preoperatively. After co-registering MRE images with contrast-enhanced 3D T1-weighted images, three regions of interest (ROIs) were placed in the areas of maximum and minimum tumor stiffness respectively to measure the shear stiffness values, and the mean was calculated as the average shear stiffness. Additionally, one ROI was placed in the white matter and one in the grey matter of the posterior horn of the lateral ventricle at the basal ganglia level to obtain normal reference values. A neurosurgeon, blind to the MRE results, graded the intraoperative tumor stiffness based on surgical videos using a 5-point scale (1: soft; 5: hard). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess inter-observer consistency. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and nonparametric tests were employed to compare the differences of shear stiffness values between groups. Spearman correlation analysis was used to examine the correlation between elasticity values and clinicopathological parameters. The discriminatory efficacy of shear stiffness values for tumor types was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
Results
2
The ICCs for elasticity values measured by two physicians in the hardest and softest tumor areas were 0.868 and 0.831, respectively (both
P
< 0.01). The maximum, minimum, and average shear stiffness values of meningiomas[(1.91±0.28) m/s, (1.66±0.25) m/s, (1.78±0.26) m/s, respectively] were significantly higher than those of gliomas[(1.59±0.23) m/s, (1.42±0.23) m/s, (1.50±0.22) m/s, respectively (
P
<0.05)]. The shear stiffness values of vestibular schwannomas[(1.70±0.30) m/s, (1.51±0.23) m/s, (1.61±0.26) m/s, respectively) were lower than those of meningiomas and higher than those of gliomas, but these differences were not statistically significant (both
P
>0.05). The shear stiffness values of white matter were significantly hig
her than that of grey matter[(1.63±0.08) m/s
vs.
(1.39±0.12) m/s,
P
<0.05)]. In the overall sample, the maximum, minimum, and average shear stiffness values were significantly positively correlated with the intraoperative hardness grade (
r
s
= 0.591,
r
s
= 0.541,
r
s
= 0.571, respectively; all
P<
0.001), negatively correlated with WHO grade (
r
s
= -0.458,
r
s
= -0.458,
r
s
= -0.480, respectively; all
P
<0.01), but showed no correlation with Ki-67 (all
P
>0.05).
Conclusion
2
MRE can be used to assess the stiffness of intracranial tumors and to some extent differentiate between tumor types, which aids in formulating more individualized preoperative surgical plans.
Price M , Ballard C , Benedetti J , et al . CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2017-2021 [J]. Neuro Oncol , 2024 , 26 ( Supplement_6 ): vi1-vi85.
Hajikarimloo B , Habibi MA , Sabbagh Alvani M , et al . Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery in vestibular schwannoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Clin Neurosci , 2024 , 130 : 110905 .
阴鲁鑫 , 徐义强 , 肖维汉 , 等 . 成人胶质母细胞瘤TERT启动子和ATRX突变预后价值 [J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志 , 2023 , 49 ( 8 ): 449 - 455 .
Yin LX , Xu YQ , Xiao WH , et al . Prognostic value of TERT promoter and ATRX mutations in adult glioblastoma [J]. Chin J Nerv Ment Dis , 2023 , 49 ( 8 ): 449 - 455 .
Itamura K , Chang KE , Lucas J , et al . Prospective clinical validation of a meningioma consistency grading scheme: association with surgical outcomes and extent of tumor resection [J]. J Neurosurg , 2019 , 131 ( 5 ): 1356 - 1360 .
Song XZ , Huang PS , Liu XY , et al . Advanced imaging and localization techniques in brain tumor resection: a review for precision tumor removal [J]. Brain Res Bull , 2025 , 230 : 111533 .
Duhon BH , Thompson K , Fisher M , et al . Tumor biomechanical stiffness by magnetic resonance elastography predicts surgical outcomes and identifies biomarkers in vestibular schwannoma and meningioma [J]. Sci Rep , 2024 , 14 ( 1 ): 14561 .
Hoover JM , Morris JM , Meyer FB . Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging T1 and T2 sequences to determine intraoperative meningioma consistency [J]. Surg Neurol Int , 2011 , 2 : 142 .
Romani R , Tang WJ , Mao Y , et al . Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging for predicting the consistency of intracranial meningiomas [J]. Acta Neurochirurgica , 2014 , 156 ( 10 ): 1837 - 1845 .
Lu YP , Xiong J , Geng DY , et al . Prediction of the consistency of pituitary adenoma: a comparative study on diffusion-weighted imaging and pathological results [J]. J Neuroradiol , 2016 , 43 ( 3 ): 186 - 194 .
Snellings J , Keshi E , Tang P , et al . Solid fraction determines stiffness and viscosity in decellularized pancreatic tissues [J]. Biomater Adv , 2022 , 139 : 212999 .
Pepin KM , Welle CL , Guglielmo FF , et al . Magnetic resonance elastography of the liver: everything you need to know to get started [J]. Abdom Radiol (NY) , 2022 , 47 ( 1 ): 94 - 114 .
Duarte-Rojo A , Taouli B , Leung DH , et al . Imaging-based noninvasive liver disease assessment for staging liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease: a systematic review supporting the AASLD Practice Guideline [J]. Hepatology , 2025 , 81 ( 2 ): 725 - 748 .
Xu L , Lin Y , Han JC , et al . Magnetic resonance elastography of brain tumors: preliminary results [J]. Acta Radiologica , 2007 , 48 ( 3 ): 327 - 330 .
Sakai N , Takehara Y , Yamashita S , et al . Shear stiffness of 4 common intracranial tumors measured using MR elastography: comparison with intraoperative consistency grading [J]. Am J Neuroradiol , 2016 , 37 ( 10 ): 1851 - 1859 .
Meyer T , Marticorena Garcia S , Tzschatzsch H , et al . Comparison of inversion methods in MR elastography: an open-access pipeline for processing multifrequency shear-wave data and demonstration in a phantom, human kidneys, and brain [J]. Magn Reson Med , 2022 , 88 ( 4 ): 1840 - 1850 .
Page G , Julea F , Paradis V , et al . Comparative analysis of a locally resampling MR elastography reconstruction algorithm in liver fibrosis [J]. J Magn Reson Imaging , 2023 , 58 ( 2 ): 403 - 414 .
Murphy MC , Huston Iii J , Glaser KJ , et al . Preoperative assessment of meningioma stiffness using magnetic resonance elastography [J]. J Neurosurg , 2013 , 118 ( 3 ): 643 - 648 .
Hiscox LV , Johnson CL , Barnhill E , et al . Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) of the human brain: technique, findings and clinical applications [J]. Phys Med Biol , 2016 , 61 ( 24 ): R401 - R437 .
Reiss-Zimmermann M , Streitberger KJ , Sack I , et al . High resolution imaging of viscoelastic properties of intracranial tumours by multi-frequency magnetic resonance elastography [J]. Clin Neuroradiol , 2014 , 25 ( 4 ): 371 - 378 .
Svensson SF , Halldorsson S , Latysheva A , et al . MR elastography identifies regions of extracellular matrix reorganization associated with shorter survival in glioblastoma patients [J]. Neurooncol Adv , 2023 , 5 ( 1 ): 1 - 13 .
Pepin KM , Mcgee KP , Arani A , et al . MR elastography analysis of glioma stiffness and IDH1-mutation status [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol , 2018 , 39 ( 1 ): 31 - 36 .
Rizk AR , Adam A , Gugel I , et al . Implications of vestibular schwannoma consistency: analysis of 140 cases regarding radiologic and clinical features [J]. World Neurosurg , 2017 , 99 : 159 - 163 .
Takamura T , Motosugi U , Ogiwara M , et al . Relationship between shear stiffness measured by MR elastography and perfusion metrics measured by perfusion CT of meningiomas [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol , 2021 , 42 ( 7 ): 1216 - 1222 .
Shi Y , Huo YL , Pan C , et al . Use of magnetic resonance elastography to gauge meningioma intratumoral consistency and histotype [J]. Neuroimage Clin , 2022 , 36 : 103173 .
0
Views
144
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621